Key result
Patients with HFNEF exhibited significantly more exercise-induced torsional dyssynchrony compared to controls (SDSM 38.8 vs 25.9 ms, p=0.02), which correlated with reduced exercise capacity.
Why the study?
Does exercise induce torsional dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure and normal ejection fraction compared to controls?
Observational (n=105)
Does exercise induce torsional dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure and normal ejection fraction compared to controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 38.8% vs 25.9%
p-value: p=0.02
Patients with heart failure and normal ejection fraction exhibit exercise-induced torsional dyssynchrony, which correlates with left ventricular hypertrophy and reduced exercise capacity.
May link torsional dyssynchrony to exercise intolerance in HFNEF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) systole and diastole are intimately dependent on myocardial torsion, which involves coupling between myocardial rotation (twisting in systole and untwisting in diastole) and longitudinal motion. Heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFNEF) is known to involve exercise-induced wall motion abnormalities, but torsion on exercise has not been explored. We hypothesised that torsional dyssynchrony may also be involved and be exaggerated by exercise. METHODS AND RESULTS: 67 patients (age 73±7 years, 45 female) with HFNEF and 38 controls underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing and echocardiography at rest and on supine exercise. Analysis of three plane motions was performed using speckle tracking and tissue Doppler imaging. Torsional dyssynchrony was quantified as the SD of the time to peak systolic motion (SDSM) (basal and apical rotation, longitudinal and radial displacement); the time difference between peak twist and peak longitudinal displacement (twist-longitudinal motion delay, TLMD) and the ratio of untwist to longitudinal extension (UT:LE). At rest, HFNEF patients had similar SDSM, TLMD and UT:LE compared with controls. Exercise was associated with significantly more dyssynchrony in the HFNEF patients (SDSM 38.8±27.6 ms vs 25.9±15.5 ms, p=0.02; TLMD 28.4±46.2 ms vs 2.9±31.2 ms, p=0.005 and UT:LE 10.4±15.3 vs 3.3±3.8, p=0.022). The SDSM correlated positively with LV wall thickness (r=0.31, p=0.015) and negatively with peak oxygen consumption (r=-0.299, p=0.01) and changes in stroke volume on exercise (r=-0.371, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HFNEF involves exercise-induced torsional dyssynchrony in systole and diastole, which relates to LV hypertrophy as well as exercise capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFNEF) (n=105). Heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFNEF) vs. Controls was evaluated on SD of the time to peak systolic motion (SDSM) on exercise (p=0.02). Patients with HFNEF exhibited significantly more exercise-induced torsional dyssynchrony compared to controls (SDSM 38.8 vs 25.9 ms, p=0.02), which correlated with reduced exercise capacity.