The positive learning effect of metacognitive strategy instructions based on the cue-utilisation framework (Koriat, 1997 Koriat, A. 1997. Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126: 349–370. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) has been shown in memorising word pairs and studying expository text. The present study explored the relevance of this framework in cognitive skill acquisition for learners with and without prior domain knowledge. That is, the quality of metacomprehension and self-regulation of novices and more experienced chess players were compared, when learning an endgame of chess. The experienced chess players not only became more skilled at the endgame, but also exemplified higher metacomprehension accuracy and self-regulation than the novices. The absolute level of metacomprehension accuracy and self-regulation of the novices was close to zero. This is the first study that shows an effect of expertise on metacomprehension accuracy in cognitive skill acquisition. Differences between cognitive skill acquisition and text comprehension that might explain differences in quality of metacognitive processes between these domains are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruin et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: