Key result
Radionuclide ventriculography identified abnormal results in 17% of asymptomatic, moderate-risk individuals, separating a subset with ~50% disease prevalence from one with 2-6% estimated prevalence.
Why the study?
Does radionuclide ventriculography effectively screen for latent coronary disease in asymptomatic individuals at moderate risk?
Observational (n=98)
Does radionuclide ventriculography effectively screen for latent coronary disease in asymptomatic individuals at moderate risk?
Radionuclide ventriculography can help stratify asymptomatic individuals with positive exercise ECGs into low- and high-risk subsets for coronary disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support stratification of moderate-risk asymptomatic patients; leaves open whether screening improves outcomes.
Screening asymptomatic individuals for latent coronary disease often requires sequential testing because exercise electrocardiography typically produces more false positive than true positive results in a population with a low prevalence of coronary disease. Cardiac scintigraphy is a technique that may be employed as a confirmatory test in lieu of coronary arteriography to further evaluate the significance of a positive exercise electrocardiogram. Radionuclide ventriculography was employed in 98 asymptomatic individuals who were considered to be at moderate risk of heart disease after risk factor analysis and exercise electrocardiography. Seventeen (17%) patients had an abnormal study and underwent cardiac catheterization. Seven had coronary artery disease, two had cardiomyopathy, and eight were normal. Eighty-one (83%) patients had a normal study. Because the sensitivity of radionuclide ventriculography is 63-80%, it was postulated that 2 to 5 individuals with disease were missed. Thus, from a population with an 11-14% prevalence of disease, two subsets were identified. A large subset in which a prevalence of 2-6% could be estimated was separated from a much smaller one in which a prevalence of approximately 50% was demonstrated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindsay et al. (1989) conducted an observational in Latent coronary disease (n=98). Radionuclide ventriculography was evaluated on Abnormal study result. Radionuclide ventriculography identified abnormal results in 17% of asymptomatic, moderate-risk individuals, separating a subset with ~50% disease prevalence from one with 2-6% estimated prevalence.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: