Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We use gas-dynamical simulations of galaxy clusters to compare their X-ray and strong lensing properties. Special emphasis is laid on mass estimates. The cluster masses range between 6 × 10 14 M ⊙ and 4 × 10 15 M⊙, and they are examined at redshifts between 1 and 0. We compute the X-ray emission of the intracluster gas by thermal bremsstrahlung, add background contamination, and mimic imaging and spectral observations with current X-ray telescopes. Although the β model routinely provides excellent fits to the X-ray emission profiles, the derived masses are typically biased low because of the restricted range of radii within which the fit can be done. For β values of ∼ 2/3, which is the average in our numerically simulated sample, the mass is typically underestimated by ∼ 40 per cent. The masses of clusters which exhibit pronounced substructure are often substantially underestimated. We suggest that the ratio between peak temperature and emission-weighted average cluster temperature may provide a good indicator for ongoing merging and, therefore, for unreliable mass estimates. X-ray mass estimates are substantially improved if we fit a King density profile rather than the β model to the X-ray emission, thereby dropping the degree
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bartelmann et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: