Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article is dedicated to the investigation of the principal vectors of narrative. Being universal fenomenon, the oral narrative has become the object of research in a number of social and humanitarian disciplines such as history, psychology, linguistics, folkloristics, etc. Moreover each of these disciplines has already developed or it is forming its own methodological base for the narrative text studying which reveals not only the individual experience of a person, but, what is more, it reproduces the collective experience in which the general cultural and communicative intentions of the narrator were synthesized. The aim of this article is to anylise the peculiarities of the narrative as the important thing for solving a wide range of problematic issues and to establish the essence of its definition. The universality of the story itself or the narrative is defined in this work. The author outlines and confirms his summarising based on the studies of famous Ukrainian and foreign scholars who conduct their investigations eithor in the field of philology or the reseaches of other scientific disciplines. The interdisciplinary nature of narratology and the object of its research – narrative – is confirmed by philosophical science according to which narratives are considered as human experience organizing mechanisms. They are local due to the historical ways of their reception as they are characterized by social instrumentality and pragmatic potential. The research shows that as a means of psychoanalytic therapy, oral narratives can be treated as a part for studying communicatively important individual cases of a person’s life with further constructing typical mental structure models. The linguistic potential is highlighted as the important thing in the narrative studies. The results show that from a linguistic perspective the linguistic abilities are considered as a way of representing past experience and are equivalents to individual speech acts. In the same way, oral history and folklore studies find their expression, but it should be emphasized that the object of their research – stories about experiences – are interpreted from different perspectives: for historians it is important to find out information about certain events of the past with the help of sources, and folklorists , working in the field of cultural anthropology, trace the manifestations of worldview and certain types of cultures. Furthermore, oral story and folklore study are represented in the same way of their expression. It should be emphasized that the object of their researches – stories about life experiences – are interpreted from different perspectives. Historians focus on finding out the information about certain events of the past based on the factual knowledge. Folklorists, working in the field of cultural anthropology, draw their attention to the manifestations of worldview and certain types of cultures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nazarii SLOBODIAN (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: