Key result
The provided abstract is truncated and does not report the quantitative effects of systemic heparinization on thromboembolic complications during femoral percutaneous coronary arteriography.
Why the study?
Does systemic heparinization prevent thromboembolic complications in patients undergoing femoral percutaneous coronary arteriography?
Does systemic heparinization prevent thromboembolic complications in patients undergoing femoral percutaneous coronary arteriography?
The text discusses the rationale for systemic heparinization to prevent thromboembolic complications during femoral percutaneous coronary arteriography.
Missing quantitative data on heparin effects; leaves open the efficacy of systemic heparinization for preventing thromboembolism in femoral coronary arteriography.
THROMBOEMBOLIC complications during percutaneous coronary arteriography have frequently been described.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Three university hospitals reported higher morbidity and mortality during coronary arteriography performed by the Judkins percutaneous femoral than with the Sones right brachial arteriotomy technic.3 The two methods employ different types of catheters, with guide wires used only in the Judkins procedure. At the beginning of the Sones procedure approximately 5000 U of "local" heparin are usually injected into the artery to prevent local thrombosis. Heparin injection is not routine during the Judkins procedure. During both methods the catheter is flushed frequently with dilute heparin solution. It is now evident . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walker et al. (1973) studied Percutaneous coronary arteriography. Systemic heparinization was evaluated. The provided abstract is truncated and does not report the quantitative effects of systemic heparinization on thromboembolic complications during femoral percutaneous coronary arteriography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: