Key result
A consensus-based, lean case report form for heart failure device trials was developed, reducing baseline data items from 176 in original CRFs to 75.
Why the study?
The development of treatments for heart failure is challenged by burdensome clinical trials, and reducing extensive data collection while increasing data compatibility may improve efficiency and reduce resource burden.
A multi-stakeholder consortium developed a lean, consensus case report form containing 75 baseline items to improve efficiency and reduce administrative burden in heart failure device clinical trials.
May ease administrative burden in HF device trials; leaves open prospective validation of data quality and efficiency gains.
The development of treatments for heart failure (HF) is challenged by burdensome clinical trials. Reducing the need for extensive data collection and increasing opportunities for data compatibility between trials may improve efficiency and reduce resource burden. The Heart Failure Collaboratory (HFC) multi-stakeholder consortium sought to create a lean case report form (CRF) for use in HF clinical trials evaluating cardiac devices. The HFC convened patients, clinicians, clinical researchers, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), payers, industry partners, and statisticians to create a consensus core CRF. Eight recent clinical trial CRFs for the treatment of HF from 6 industry partners were analyzed. All CRF elements were systematically reviewed. Those elements deemed critical for data collection in HF clinical trials were used to construct the final, harmonized CRF. The original CRFs included 176 distinct data items covering demographics, vital signs, physical examination, medical history, laboratory and imaging testing, device therapy, medications, functional and quality of life assessment, and outcome events. The resulting, minimally inclusive CRF device contains 75 baseline data items and 6 events, with separate modular additions that can be used depending on the additional detail required for a particular intervention. The consensus electronic form is now freely available for use in clinical trials. Creation of a core CRF is important to improve clinical trial efficiency in HF device development in the United States. This living document intends to reduce clinical trial administrative burden, increase evidence integrity, and improve comparability of clinical data between trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Psotka et al. (2019) studied Heart failure. Lean case report form (CRF) vs. Original CRFs was evaluated on Number of baseline data items. A consensus-based, lean case report form for heart failure device trials was developed, reducing baseline data items from 176 in original CRFs to 75.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: