Key result
ST deviation in V6 greater than or equal to V1 was more sensitive in predicting left main coronary artery as the culprit vessel in ACS compared to greater ST elevation in aVR than V1 (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does ST segment deviation in lead V6 greater than or equal to V1 on admission ECG improve the prediction of left main coronary artery obstruction in patients with ACS compared to ST elevation in aVR greater than or equal to V1?
Observational (n=156)
Does ST segment deviation in lead V6 greater than or equal to V1 on admission ECG improve the prediction of left main coronary artery obstruction in patients with ACS compared to ST elevation in aVR greater than or equal to V1?
p-value: p=<0.001
ST segment deviation in lead V6 greater than or equal to V1 is a more sensitive ECG predictor of left main coronary artery obstruction than the traditional aVR criteria in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
May support refined ECG criteria for left main culprit in ACS; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) resulting from culprit lesion in left main coronary artery (LMCA) can cause rapid hemodynamic deterioration. It is important to identify these patients early to facilitate timely revascularization. ST segment elevation in aVR greater than or equal to V(1) (aVR-V(1)>or= 0) has been suggested as a sensitive predictor of LMCA disease. As a result of balanced forces, we hypothesized that ST deviation in V(6) greater than or equal to ST deviation in V(1) (V(6)-V(1)>or= 0) might be a good determinant of LMCA disease. METHODS: We compared admission 12-lead ECGs of ACS resulting from culprit LMCA lesion (n = 75, group I) with ACS resulting from culprit left anterior descending lesion (n = 81, group II). Group I was selected over a period of 10 years. We compared V(6)-V(1)>or= 0 to aVR-V(1)>or= 0 in both groups. We also looked at ratios of ST deviations in V(6),V(1) (V(6)/V(1)>or= 1) and aVR,V(1) (aVR/V(1)>or= 1) in patients where ST segment in V(1) was not isoelectric (group I = 54 and group II = 55). RESULTS: ST deviation in V(6) was significantly greater in group I as compared to group II (P < 0.001). The reliabilities of V(6)-V(1)>or= 0, V(6)/V(1)>or= 1, aVR-V(1)>or= 0, and aVR/V(1)>or= 1 in predicting LMCA disease were determined. CONCLUSION: This is the largest series of ECG analysis on ACS resulting from culprit LMCA lesion. V(6)-V(1)>or= 0 and V(6)/V(1)>or= 1 were more sensitive in predicting LMCA as culprit vessel in comparison to previously reported greater ST segment elevation in aVR than V(1).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahajan et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Acute coronary syndrome (n=156). ST segment deviation in lead V6 greater than or equal to V1 vs. ST segment elevation in aVR greater than or equal to V1 was evaluated on ST deviation in V6 (p=<0.001). ST deviation in V6 greater than or equal to V1 was more sensitive in predicting left main coronary artery as the culprit vessel in ACS compared to greater ST elevation in aVR than V1 (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: