Why the study?
Does a rehabilitation programme with the Edinburgh Heart Manual improve psychosocial outcomes in patients following a first MI?
Does a rehabilitation programme with the Edinburgh Heart Manual improve psychosocial outcomes in patients following a first MI?
The use of the Edinburgh Heart Manual in post-MI rehabilitation improves illness control beliefs and reduces depression compared to standard hospital-based programs.
May improve post-MI illness beliefs and reduce depression versus hospital programs; hypothesis-generating, needs randomized confirmation.
This study compared the relative efficacy of two different rehabilitation programmes (one with and one without the Edinburgh Heart Manual) on psychosocial outcome following a first myocardial infarction (MI). A six-month longitudinal design was used to assess changes in the following variables: Locus of control, significant other support, illness perceptions, anxiety, depression and generalized self-efficacy. These variables were also used to predict general practitioner (GP) contact and hospital admissions in the six months following the MI. Patients receiving the manual (N = 45) reported stronger beliefs in their ability to control the illness (p< 0.05) and less depression (p< 0.01) at follow-up, compared with patients receiving a hospital-based exercise and education programme (N = 25). There was no significant difference between the two groups on GP contact and hospital admissions in the six months after the MI. Baseline anxiety predicted GP contact in the six months post-MI (p< 0.001).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Rourke et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: