Why the study?
Does exercise-based rehabilitation improve depression scores in depressed post-myocardial infarction patients?
Cohort (n=44)
Does exercise-based rehabilitation improve depression scores in depressed post-myocardial infarction patients?
Exercise-based rehabilitation over 4 years is associated with significant improvements in depression scores among post-myocardial infarction patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Associated with improved post-MI depression scores; hypothesis-generating, requires RCTs before practice change.
A proportion of postcoronary patients seen 16 to 18 months after infarction are seriously depressed (high D score on Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory). A follow-up of 44 such depressed patients showed a significant (p less than 0.001) decrease of standardized D scores, from 80 to 72 units over 4 years of exercise-based rehabilitation. There were associated decreases in scores for hysteria, hypochondriasis, and psychasthenia. A decrease of D score was associated with exercise compliance. An increase of D score was associated with a significant (p less than 0.05) worsening of ST segmental sagging, suggesting that progression of the disease process had contributed to the increase of depression. All of the patients had high (feminine) scores on the masculinity/femininity scale of the MMPI test. This finding was unrelated to the daily running distance or medication; it could represent a "feminine" personality, or be a typical response in a well-educated white collar group. Evidence of successful group interaction may be indicated by reduction in scores for social introversion and schizophrenic traits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kavanagh et al. (1977) conducted a cohort in Depression following myocardial infarction (n=44). Exercise-based rehabilitation (distance running) was evaluated on Standardized D (depression) scores on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: