Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The long-term results of uncemented total hip arthroplasties vary widely due to differences in design, metal alloy, coating, surface structure, and porosity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 75 cementless Zweymuller SL stems in combination with Endler titanium-backed threaded cups (Z-E) in 70 patients. 35 patients were women, and the mean age at surgery was 52 (24-68) years. 16 patients died and 1 emigrated, 7 patients (of which 1 later died) subsequently underwent revision, and the remaining 47 patients with 50 original arthroplasties were followed up after a median of 16 (15-18) years. RESULTS: Revision of 8 hips resulted in an 18-year Kaplan-Meier estimated overall survival rate of 88% (CI: 79-96). 6 of 7 cup revisions were due to liner wear and osteolysis, and 1 was due to aseptic loosening. 2 of 3 stem revisions were due to femoral loosening and 1 was due to fracture of the neck of the stem. The clinical results were good, with a mean Harris hip score of 89 (54-100). Half of 70 hips in 65 patients had ectopic bone formation. All unrevised implants were radiographically stable, with a mean liner wear of 0.07 mm/year. INTERPRETATION: These long-term results demonstrate that the combination of a Zweymuller SL stem and an Endler titanium-backed screw cup is a good hip arthroplasty in young and active patients. A prefixed polyethylene liner is a drawback, necessitating exchange of the whole cup in cases with polyethylene wear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reigstad et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: