Key result
Compensated patients in natural cold treatment trials report inaccurate illness onset histories, with day 1 symptom scores matching 48-hour experimental cold scores.
Why the study?
Are histories regarding the onset of illness given by compensated patients in natural cold treatment trials accurate compared to experimental and noncompensated natural colds?
Population
Subjects with experimental rhinovirus colds, patients with natural rhinovirus and nonrhinovirus colds in a…
Comparison
Experimental rhinovirus inoculation and… vs Compensated patients receiving placebo in…
Authors
Loading...
Inaccurate compensated patient histories may bias natural cold trial efficacy estimates; leaves open need for objective onset verification in future studies.
Observational
Are histories regarding the onset of illness given by compensated patients in natural cold treatment trials accurate compared to experimental and noncompensated natural colds?
Histories given by compensated patients in natural cold treatment trials are inaccurate regarding the onset and duration of illness.
Gwaltney et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Common cold. Compensated natural cold treatment trials vs. Experimental colds and noncompensated natural colds was evaluated on Mean total symptom severity scores and peak timing. Compensated patients in natural cold treatment trials report inaccurate illness onset histories, with day 1 symptom scores matching 48-hour experimental cold scores.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: