Key result
Discontinuing low-dose ASA after acute gastrointestinal bleeding was associated with a twofold increase in one-year all-cause mortality compared to continuation (HR 2.16; 95% CI 1.39-3.35).
Why the study?
It is uncertain whether low-dose acetylsalicylic acid should be continued in patients who develop acute gastrointestinal bleeding during therapy.
Does continuing low-dose acetylsalicylic acid reduce mortality in patients who develop acute gastrointestinal bleeding?
Cohort (n=548)
No
Does continuing low-dose acetylsalicylic acid reduce mortality in patients who develop acute gastrointestinal bleeding?
Hazard Ratio: 2.16 (95% CI 1.39–3.35)
Continuing low-dose aspirin after a gastrointestinal bleed is associated with lower 1-year all-cause mortality without an increased risk of re-bleeding.
Supports continuing low-dose ASA after GI bleed to potentially lower mortality; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Background Gastrointestinal bleeding is a common clinical problem in patients using low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). It is uncertain whether aspirin should continue to be used in patients who develop acute gastrointestinal bleeding during low-dose ASA therapy.Aims To assess whether ASA should be continued in patients who develop GI bleeding during low-dose ASA.Methods All patients admitted to an academic hospital for acute gastrointestinal bleeding between 2009 and 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical characteristics, comorbidities, medications and treatments were recorded from the patient records. Patients were divided into two groups based on continuing or discontinuing ASA after discharge.Results A total of 548 patients were included. ASA was continued in 282 (51.5%) (ASAc group) and discontinued in 266 (48.5%) patients (ASAd group). ASAc patients had more often coronary artery disease (57.8% vs. 42.5%, p < .001) and peripheral artery disease (17.4% vs. 9.0%, p = .004) than ASAd patients, whereas no differences were found in other comorbidities. There was no difference in 30-day all-cause mortality between ASAd and ASAc groups. However, after adjustment for age, gender and comorbidities, one-year all-cause mortality was double in the ASAd group (hazard ratio 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.39–3.35). ASAd and ASAc groups did not differ with respect to cardiovascular mortality (4.9% vs. 5.3%, p = .811, respectively) or re-bleeding (10.2% vs. 9.2%, p = .713, respectively).Conclusion Continuing low-dose ASA after gastrointestinal bleeding was associated with lower all-cause mortality during the first year without increasing the risk of re-bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miilunpohja et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Acute gastrointestinal bleeding during low-dose ASA therapy (n=548). Discontinuing low-dose ASA vs. Continuing low-dose ASA was evaluated on One-year all-cause mortality (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.39-3.35). Discontinuing low-dose ASA after acute gastrointestinal bleeding was associated with a twofold increase in one-year all-cause mortality compared to continuation (HR 2.16; 95% CI 1.39-3.35).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: