Key result
Rivaroxaban and clopidogrel reduced ischemia-reperfusion injury in multiple tissues, with rivaroxaban being superior to clopidogrel in protecting ischemic muscle (p<0.010).
Why the study?
The study aimed to compare clopidogrel and rivaroxaban against ischemia-reperfusion injury after a long reperfusion time and investigate their effects across various tissues.
Does rivaroxaban or clopidogrel pre-treatment reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rat lower extremity model?
RCT (n=40)
Randomly divided
Does rivaroxaban or clopidogrel pre-treatment reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rat lower extremity model?
In a rat model of lower extremity ischemia-reperfusion, both rivaroxaban and clopidogrel reduced oxidative injury across multiple tissues, with rivaroxaban offering additional kidney protection and superior muscle protection.
Should not yet change clinical practice; hypothesis-generating for rivaroxaban in ischemia-reperfusion models.
BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare clopidogrel and rivaroxaban against ischemia-reperfusion injury after a long reperfusion time and to investigate its effects on various tissues. METHODS: A total of 40 Wistar rats were included in the study and were randomly divided into four groups (n=10 per group). Groups were defined as follows: control (Group 1), sham (Group 2), clopidogrel pre-treatment (Group 3), and rivaroxaban pre-treatment (Group 4). Ischemia (6 h) and reperfusion (8 h) were induced at the lower hind limb in Groups 2, 3, and 4. The ischemic muscle, heart, kidney, liver, and plasma tissues of the subjects were obtained to test for the oxidant (malondialdehyde) and antioxidants (glutathione, superoxide dismutase, and nitric oxide). RESULTS: Malondialdehyde levels were significantly higher in the sham group, compared to the controls in all tissues. Clopidogrel and rivaroxaban pre-treatment significantly decreased malondialdehyde levels, compared to the heart, ischemic muscle, liver, and blood tissues of the sham group. Kidney malondialdehyde levels were reduced only by rivaroxaban. Group 4 had significantly decreased malondialdehyde levels, compared to Group 3 in ischemic muscle (p<0.010). The glutathione reduction, compared to sham group, in the kidney was only significant for Group 4 (p<0.050). With clopidogrel and rivaroxaban pretreatment, nitric oxide levels significantly decreased only in the heart tissue, compared to sham group (p<0.001 and p<0.050, respectively). CONCLUSION: The study results suggest that rivaroxaban and clopidogrel are effective in reducing ischemia-reperfusion injury in the heart, ischemic muscle, liver, and blood. Rivaroxaban also protects the kidneys and is superior to clopidogrel in ischemic muscle protection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ersan Özbudak (2019) conducted an RCT in Ischemia-reperfusion injury (n=40). Rivaroxaban and clopidogrel vs. Sham and control was evaluated on Tissue levels of malondialdehyde, glutathione, superoxide dismutase, and nitric oxide (p=<0.010). Rivaroxaban and clopidogrel reduced ischemia-reperfusion injury in multiple tissues, with rivaroxaban being superior to clopidogrel in protecting ischemic muscle (p<0.010).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: