Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review evaluates surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted prostatectomy, showing its effectiveness for prostate cancer treatment.
With the widespread diffusion of the screening for prostate cancer, the disease has been diagnosed more commonly in the organ-confined stage, and in younger and healthier men. For these patients, radical prostatectomy (RP) is still the standard treatment. In an effort to decrease the morbidity associated with open RP, minimally invasive approaches have been described, including robotic-assisted RP (RALP). Almost one decade after the introduction of RALP, large and mature series have now been reported. We reviewed the outcomes of the largest series of RALP published recently. We searched Medline for reports published between 2006 and 2009, to identify articles describing intraoperative data, surgical complications, oncological outcomes, continence and potency rates after RALP. Relevant articles were selected and the outcomes evaluated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coelho et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: