Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper critically explores the classed assumptions underpinning contemporary family policy, situating them within the context of broader political and theoretical debates about parenting responsibility. Analysis of policy documents over the past few years suggests that the family is being prioritized as a mechanism for tackling wider social ills such as crime and poverty. Families are portrayed as the ‘building blocks for safe and sustainable communities’, with good parents fostering and transmitting crucial values to their children which protect and reproduce the common good. Although the current government has pledged to support all parents, policy initiatives point to a class‐specific focus on disadvantaged or 'socially excluded’ families. Poor parents are viewed as reproducing a cycle of deprivation and anti‐social behaviour and are therefore targeted for behaviour modification. Drawing on research from a qualitative study of parenting resources, this paper will challenge the notion that social inclusion can be promoted at the level of the family, and will argue instead that parenting practices and values are grounded in social and economic realities.
Val Gillies (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: