Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Studies have explored how human spatial attention appears allocated in three-dimensional (3D) space. It has been demonstrated that target distance from the viewer can modulate performance in target detection and localization tasks: reaction times are shorter when targets appear nearer to the observer compared to farther distances (i.e., near advantage). Times have reached to quantitatively analyze this literature. In the current meta-analysis, 29 studies (n = 1260 participants) examined target detection and localization across 3-D space. Moderator analyses included: detection vs localization tasks, spatial cueing vs uncued tasks, control of retinal size across depth, central vs peripheral targets, real-space vs stereoscopic vs monocular depth environments, and inclusion of in-trial motion. The analyses revealed a near advantage for spatial attention that was affected by the moderating variables of controlling for retinal size across depth, the use of spatial cueing tasks, and the inclusion of in-trial motion. Overall, these results provide an up-to-date quantification of the effect of depth and provide insight into methodological differences in evaluating spatial attention. • Target detection and localization are fastest when targets appear closer to the participant. • Spatial cueing tasks may provide a more sensitive measure for the effect of depth. • Near advantages for attention appear exaggerated while moving (e.g., driving). • Prioritizing attention in near space may represent an evolutionary protective mechanism. • This behaviour advantage may reflect specialized processing from the dorsal visual pathway.
Britt et al. (Thu,) studied this question.