Key result
This review summarizes the performance and results of cerebral protection devices designed to reduce the 2.7% to 5.5% 30-day risk of cerebrovascular events during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Why the study?
Cerebrovascular events remain a severe complication of TAVR as indications expand to younger and lower-risk patients, highlighting the need to evaluate stroke prevention strategies.
Do cerebral protection devices reduce the risk of cerebrovascular events during transcatheter aortic valve replacement?
Do cerebral protection devices reduce the risk of cerebrovascular events during transcatheter aortic valve replacement?
This review summarizes the performance and results of cerebral protection devices designed to reduce the 2.7% to 5.5% 30-day risk of cerebrovascular events during TAVR.
Cerebral protection device role in TAVR remains undefined; leaves open need for randomized trials to confirm stroke reduction.
Aortic stenosis is the most prevalent primary valve disease in developed countries. Its prevalence is increasing due to population aging. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a sterling therapy for symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and high or intermediate surgery risk. The number of procedures has increased exponentially expanding to younger and lower risk patients. Despite new-generation TAVR devices and enhanced operator skills, cerebrovascular events (CVEs) carry on being one of the most severe complications, increasing morbi-mortality. CVE might be under reported because there are few studies with rigorous neurological clinical assessment. Several imaging studies show most of CVE after TAVR has a probable embolic etiology. The risk of CVE ranges from 2.7% to 5.5% at 30 days. As TAVR expands to younger and lower risk patients, the prevention of stroke plays an increasingly important role. Cerebral protection devices (CPD) were designed to reduce the risk of CVE during TAVR. This review describes the scientific evidence on CVE after TAVR and summarizes the performance and results of the main CPDs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cubero-Gallego et al. (2019) conducted a review in Aortic stenosis. Cerebral protection devices was evaluated. This review summarizes the performance and results of cerebral protection devices designed to reduce the 2.7% to 5.5% 30-day risk of cerebrovascular events during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: