Why the study?
Does treprostinil improve hemodynamics and exercise capacity in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension?
Does treprostinil improve hemodynamics and exercise capacity in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension?
Subcutaneous treprostinil provides favorable acute and short-term hemodynamic and functional improvements in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension.
Supports subcutaneous treprostinil to enhance exercise capacity in primary PH; confirms short-term functional benefits in this RCT.
Intravenous epoprostenol is currently FDA approved for management of primary pulmonary hypertension, but it requires intravenous infusion and is associated with adverse effects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of an epoprostenol analog, treprostinil, for management of pulmonary hypertension. Ten tertiary care academic institutions with pulmonary hypertension programs participated in these pilot trials. In the first trial, intravenous epoprostenol and intravenous treprostinil were compared. In the second trial, intravenous treprostinil and subcutaneous treprostinil were compared. In the third trial, subcutaneous treprostinil was compared with placebo infusion during an 8-week period. Intravenous epoprostenol and intravenous treprostinil resulted in a similar reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance acutely (22% and 20%, respectively). Intravenous treprostinil and subcutaneous treprostinil also demonstrated comparable short-term decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance (23% and 28%, respectively). The placebo-controlled 8-week trial demonstrated a mean improvement of 37 +/- 17 m as measured by the 6-minute walk distance in patients receiving treprostinil compared with a 6 +/- 28 m reduction in those receiving placebo. There were trends toward an improvement in cardiac index and pulmonary vascular resistance index in the treprostinil group. Subcutaneous treprostinil has favorable hemodynamic effects when given acutely and in the short term. Treprostinil can be given safely to an ambulatory patient with a novel subcutaneous delivery pump system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McLaughlin et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: