Key result
Lower Prognostic Nutritional Index is linked to a ~5-day longer hospital stay after heart surgery.
Why the study?
Malnutrition is linked to adverse cardiac surgery outcomes, motivating an evaluation of the prognostic nutritional index for predicting postoperative mortality, hospital and ICU stays, and infection rates.
Does a low Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) predict adverse postoperative outcomes such as longer hospital stays and higher mortality in patients undergoing heart surgery?
Cross-Sectional (n=264)
No
Does a low Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) predict adverse postoperative outcomes such as longer hospital stays and higher mortality in patients undergoing heart surgery?
Lower Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) is associated with longer hospital stays in patients undergoing heart surgery, highlighting the importance of preoperative nutritional assessment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suggests preoperative PNI screening may aid risk stratification in cardiac surgery; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Background Malnutrition is associated with adverse outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a validated tool for assessing nutritional status in cardiovascular diseases. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of PNI in heart surgery patients, including mortality rate, length of hospital and ICU stays, and infection rate, while investigating correlations with demographic and clinical characteristics. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Data from electronic medical records of patients undergoing heart surgery between 2019 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The study involved patients with valvular heart disease, including those requiring concomitant procedures. Statistical analysis was conducted using t-tests, logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis. Results This study included 264 individuals with a mean age of 56.48±12.11 years. The prevalence of low PNI was 50.80% and high PNI was 49.20%. No significant differences in PNI levels were found between individuals with various clinical conditions, except for target vessel revascularization. The mortality rate was slightly higher in the low PNI group, but not statistically significant. Significant differences in laboratory findings were observed between high and low PNI groups. Individuals with low PNI had longer hospital stays. Conclusion Lower PNI levels consistently correlate with longer hospital stays and higher morbidity and mortality rates, suggesting the potential importance of PNI and other nutritional markers in assessing risk and predicting outcomes in cardiac surgery patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almohammadi et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart surgery (n=264). Low Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) vs. High PNI (>53.27) was evaluated on Length of hospital stay (days). Lower Prognostic Nutritional Index levels were associated with a longer mean length of hospital stay (54.3 days vs 49.2 days) in patients undergoing heart surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: