Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LCA was applied to paddy rice farming with a relatively low livestock production area on a mid-river basin scale in Japan. Conventional farming, standard application of chemical fertilizer and manure, and low chemical fertilizer input and forage production scenarios were tested. The aquatic eutrophication potential and the global warming potential per unit of crude protein production were lower for low chemical fertilizer input and forage production than for conventional farming, although terrestrial eutrophication was not reduced. These results indicated that reduced input would be effective in areas with contamination of ground and surface water and regulation of nutrient input would be reasonable. Abiotic resource use was also lower for low chemical fertilizer input and forage production than for conventional farming. Recycling of livestock excreta would be viable in non-intensive livestock production areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mishima et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: