Why the study?
Does incubation with S(-) vs R(+) warfarin alter the intracellular protein profile in HepG2 cells?
Does incubation with S(-) vs R(+) warfarin alter the intracellular protein profile in HepG2 cells?
S(-) and R(+) enantiomers of warfarin induce distinct proteomic changes in HepG2 cells, providing molecular insights into stereoselective warfarin-cell interactions.
Warfarin enantiomer-specific proteomic shifts in HepG2 cells; hypothesis-generating and requires in vivo validation before any clinical consideration.
Warfarin is a commonly prescribed oral anti-coagulant with narrow therapeutic index. It interferes with vitamin K cycle to achieve anti-coagulating effects. Warfarin has two enantiomers, S(-) and R(+) and undergoes stereoselective metabolism, with the S(-) enantiomer being more effective. We reported that the intracellular protein profile in HepG2 cells incubated with S(-) and R(+) warfarin, using iTRAQ-coupled 2-D LC-MS/MS. In samples incubated with S(-) and R(+) warfarin alone, the multi-task protein Protein SET showed significant elevation in cells incubated with S(-) warfarin but not in those incubated with R(+) warfarin. In cells incubated with individual enantiomers of warfarin in the presence of vitamin K, protein disulfide isomerase A3 which is known as a glucose-regulated protein, in cells incubated with S(-) warfarin was found to be down-regulated compared to those incubated with R(+) warfarin. In addition, Protein DJ-1 and 14-3-3 Proteinsigma were down-regulated in cells incubated with either S(-) or R(+) warfarin regardless of the presence of vitamin K. Our results indicated that Protein DJ-1 may act as an enzyme for expression of essential enzymes in vitamin K cycle. Taken together, our findings provided molecular evidence on a comprehensive protein profile on warfarin-cell interaction, which may shed new lights on future improvement of warfarin therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: