Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, item analysis, and construct and concurrent criterion-related validity of the Writing Essential Skill Screener — Preschool Version (WESS-P) were studied using four independent samples of boys and girls, ages 4 through 5. Median item difficulty was.65 and median item discrimination was.84 for the standardization sample. A decision reliability study resulted in accurate decisions being made for 92% of a sample of children with and without pre-writing skill deficiencies. A one-factor principal component solution was derived. Internal consistency was.95 and.93, whereas 30-day test-retest reliability was.91. The WESS-P yielded concurrent cirterion-related validity coefficients of.85 with the Test of Early Written Language (TEWL), and.82 with the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (VMI), and accurately identified 92% of participants in a diagnostic validity study. The WESS-P displayed a high degree of reliability and validity for a brief pre-writing skills screener. Implications for policy and practice were discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bradley T. Erford (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: