Key result
Emotional visual elicitation resulted in stronger cardiorespiratory synchronization during arousal states compared to neutral states.
Why the study?
Does emotional visual elicitation affect cardiorespiratory synchronization in healthy volunteers?
Observational (n=35)
Does emotional visual elicitation affect cardiorespiratory synchronization in healthy volunteers?
Emotional arousal increases cardiorespiratory synchronization compared to neutral states in healthy volunteers.
Hypothesis-generating in healthy volunteers; leaves open clinical relevance or therapeutic targeting in cardiovascular disease.
The objective of this study is to investigate the synchronization between breathing patterns and heart rate during emotional visual elicitation, that is, using sets of images gathered from the international affective picture system having five levels of arousal and five levels of valence, including a neutral reference level. Thirty-five healthy volunteers were emotionally elicited in agreement with a bidimensional spatial localization of affective states, i.e., arousal/valence plane, while two peripheral physiological signals, ECG and Respiration activity, were acquired simultaneously. The synchronization was then quantified by applying the concept of phase synchronization of chaotic oscillators, i.e., the cardio-respiratory synchrogram. This technique allowed us to estimate the synchronization ratio m:n as the attendance of n heartbeats in each m respiratory cycle, even for noisy and nonstationary data. We found a stronger evidence of cardiorespiratory synchronization during arousal than during neutral states.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valenza et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=35). Emotional visual elicitation vs. Neutral visual elicitation was evaluated on Cardiorespiratory synchronization (synchronization ratio m:n). Emotional visual elicitation resulted in stronger cardiorespiratory synchronization during arousal states compared to neutral states.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: