Key result
Adenosine receptor agonists demonstrated similar antiplatelet activity to P2Y12 antagonists under flow conditions and significantly enhanced their anti-platelet effect when used in combination.
Why the study?
Large inter-individual variation in platelet response, including resistance to antiplatelet therapy, prompts the search for novel platelet inhibitors and new antithrombotic strategies.
Do adenosine receptor agonists enhance the anti-platelet effect of P2Y12 inhibitors in blood from healthy subjects?
Do adenosine receptor agonists enhance the anti-platelet effect of P2Y12 inhibitors in blood from healthy subjects?
Adenosine receptor agonists enhance the anti-platelet effects of P2Y12 inhibitors in vitro, potentially offering a strategy to overcome P2Y12 resistance.
Caution against clinical use from animal data alone; hypothesis-generating for adenosine agonists as P2Y12 adjuncts.
Large inter-individual variation in platelet response to endogenous agonists and pharmacological agents, including resistance to antiplatelet therapy, prompts a search for novel platelet inhibitors and development new antithrombotic strategies. The present in vitro study evaluates the beneficial effects of three adenosine receptor (AR) agonists (regadenoson, LUF 5835 and NECA), different in terms of their selectivity for platelet adenosine receptors, when used alone and in combination with P2Y12 inhibitors, such as cangrelor or prasugrel metabolite. The anti-platelet effects of AR agonists were evaluated in healthy subjects (in the whole group and after stratification of individuals into high- and low-responders to P2Y12 inhibitors), using whole blood techniques, under flow (thrombus formation) and static conditions (study of platelet activation and aggregation). Compared to P2Y12 antagonists, AR agonists were much less or not effective under static conditions, but demonstrated similar antiplatelet activity in flow. In most cases, AR agonists significantly enhanced the anti-platelet effect of P2Y12 antagonists, despite possessing different selectivity profiles and antiplatelet activities. Importantly, their inhibitory effects in combination with P2Y12 antagonists were similar in high- and low-responders to P2Y12 inhibitors. In conclusion, a combination of anti-platelet agents acting via the P1 and P2 purinergic receptors represents a promising alternative to existing antithrombotic therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wolska et al. (2019) studied Healthy subjects. Adenosine receptor (AR) agonists (regadenoson, LUF 5835 and NECA) alone and in combination with P2Y12 inhibitors vs. P2Y12 antagonists alone was evaluated on Anti-platelet effects under flow (thrombus formation) and static conditions (platelet activation and aggregation). Adenosine receptor agonists demonstrated similar antiplatelet activity to P2Y12 antagonists under flow conditions and significantly enhanced their anti-platelet effect when used in combination.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: