Key result
Reduced myocardial flow reserve in new LBBB linked to ~7-fold higher coronary angiography referrals.
Why the study?
The ability of dynamic SPECT with quantitative analysis of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve to detect CAD in patients with presumed new LBBB had not been established.
Does routine dynamic perfusion SPECT with quantitative MBF and MFR assessment improve the detection of CAD in patients with presumed new LBBB?
Cohort (n=174)
No
Does routine dynamic perfusion SPECT with quantitative MBF and MFR assessment improve the detection of CAD in patients with presumed new LBBB?
Absolute Event Rate: 44% vs 6%
p-value: p=<0.0001
The very low (2%) prevalence of confirmed CAD in patients with presumed new LBBB challenges the clinical utility of routine diagnostic screening with dynamic perfusion SPECT in this population.
Low CAD yield questions routine SPECT screening in new LBBB; leaves open whether MFR refines angiography referral in this cohort.
Aims The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the ability of dynamic SPECT with quantitative analysis of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with presumed new left bundle branch block (LBBB). Methods and results We evaluated the dynamic SPECT results from 174 consecutive patients with LBBB without a history of CAD from a single center. MBF was assessed at rest and during regadenoson (400 μg). Normal MFR was defined as ≥ 2.1. Left ventricular function and segmental perfusion were assessed from conventional gated SPECT. SPECT abnormalities were found in 17/174 (10%) patients including a reversible SPECT defect in 4 patients (2.3%), a fixed defect in 12 patients (7%), and both in 1 patient. Global left ventricular function was normal despite a significant impairment of septal wall motion. Stress and rest MBF was decreased in the septum and the inferior wall compared with other walls (P < 0.0001), resulting in similar MFR. A reduced MFR was associated with a fixed defect (P = 0.04). Only 18 patients (10%) presented with a decreased MFR. They were more often referred to subsequent coronary angiography (8/18, 44%) compared with patients with a normal MFR (9/156, 6%, χ2 = 27.382, P < 0.0001). However, significant coronary lesions were finally found in only 4/174 patients (2%). Conclusion Although a decreased MFR was associated with a fixed defect on conventional perfusion imaging, the low rate of CAD finally demonstrated in this study questions the relevance of routine screening for CAD in patients with presumed new LBBB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manrique et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Presumed new left bundle branch block (LBBB) without history of coronary artery disease (n=174). Decreased myocardial flow reserve (< 2.1) vs. Normal myocardial flow reserve (≥ 2.1) was evaluated on Referral to subsequent coronary angiography (p=<0.0001). Patients with presumed new LBBB and a decreased myocardial flow reserve (<2.1) were more frequently referred for coronary angiography (44% vs 6%, p<0.0001), though confirmed coronary lesions were found in only 2% of the overall cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: