Why the study?
Initial detection of STEMI or NSTEMI relies on a 12-lead ECG, but subjective interpretation frequently leads to delay or misdiagnosis.
Does a deep-learning model improve the detection of acute myocardial infarction from 12-lead ECGs compared to clinicians?
Does a deep-learning model improve the detection of acute myocardial infarction from 12-lead ECGs compared to clinicians?
A deep-learning model based on 12-lead ECGs demonstrated superior diagnostic performance for detecting STEMI and MI compared to clinicians, and combining it with troponin I improved NSTEMI detection.
May support DLM-assisted ECG interpretation for MI; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Abstract BackgroundThe initial detection and diagnosis of ST-segment or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI or NSTEMI) definitely rely on a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Delay or misdiagnosis is not unusual by subjective interpretation. Our aim is to develop a DLM as a diagnostic support tool to detect MI based on a 12-lead ECG and to evaluate the performance of this model.MethodsThis study included 1,051 ECGs from 737 coronary angiography (CAG)-validated STEMI patients, 697 ECGs from 287 CAG-validated NSTEMI patients, and 140,336 not-MI ECGs from 76,775 patients at emergency departments. DLM was trained and validated for the performance using 80% and 20% of the ECGs, respectively. A human-machine competition was conducted. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the performance of DLM and experts. STEMI versus not-STEMI, and MI versus not-MI were evaluated by DLM.ResultsThe AUCs of DLM for identifying STEMI and MI were 0.976 and 0.944 in the human-machine competition, respectively, which were significantly better than those of our best clinicians. In the real world setting, DLM presented with AUC of 0.995/0.916 with corresponding sensitivities of 96.9%/77.0%, and specificities of 96.2%/92.9% in the identification of STEMI and MI, respectively. Furthermore, DLM demonstrated sufficient diagnostic capacity for STEMI without the aid of troponin I (TnI) (AUC= 0.996) with corresponding sensitivity and specificity of 98.4% and 96.9%. The AUC of combined DLM and the first recorded TnI for the detection of NSTEMI were increased to 0.978 with corresponding sensitivity and specificity of 91.6% and 96.7%, which was better than that of DLM (0.877) or TnI (0.949) alone. ConclusionsDLM may serve as a diagnostic decision tool to assist intensive or emergency medical system-based networks and frontline physicians in identifying STEMI and NSTEMI in a timely and precise manner to prevent delay or misdiagnosis, and thereby to facilitate subsequent reperfusion therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: