A model for performing remote orthotic assessments using low-bandwidth computer communication technology (video conferencing) was developed, tested, and evaluated. System evaluation involved comparing a series of remote assessments with on-site assessments. While most on-site and on-line results were similar, discrepancies which occurred were attributed to between-clinician differences, measurement technique differences, technical and learning obstacles at the start of the project, and within subject variations during the day. On-line assessment efficiency improved with each on-line session and corresponded with increased confidence in the system, easier system use, and better overall satisfaction. An on-line debriefing session was held with all project clinicians. These clinicians supported continued use of the communication system for rehabilitation consultation and education. Clinically. preliminary face-to-face meetings and a regular practice schedule were recommended. Technically, the system was considered good; however, suggested improvements included using a high quality speaker-phone system, streamlining the video capture process, and providing more reliable telecommunication connections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lemaire et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: