Key result
Preoperative IV iron in anemic patients is linked to perioperative outcomes matching nonanemic surgical patients.
Why the study?
The study aimed to compare surgical outcomes between patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery with preoperative anemia treated with intravenous iron replacement and nonanemic patients.
Does short-term preoperative intravenous iron replacement in anemic patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery result in surgical outcomes comparable to nonanemic patients?
Cohort (n=193)
Does short-term preoperative intravenous iron replacement in anemic patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery result in surgical outcomes comparable to nonanemic patients?
Preoperative intravenous iron replacement in anemic patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery yields perioperative outcomes comparable to those of nonanemic patients, suggesting it is an effective strategy for surgical readiness.
May support preoperative IV iron in anemic cardiovascular surgery patients; hypothesis-generating, does not yet warrant practice change.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare surgical outcomes between patients scheduled for cardiovascular surgery diagnosed with anemia according to the World Health Organization criteria who received intravenous iron replacement and those who were not anemic. Patients and methods: This retrospective study analyzed patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery between February 2021 and January 2024. Patients with preoperative anemia treated with intravenous iron replacement were compared with nonanemic patients. Data on demographics, preoperative conditions, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: Of the 193 patients (142 males, 51 females; mean age: 62±10 years; range, 27 to 82 years) analyzed, 173 survived, and 20 did not. Surviving patients were younger and had a lower body mass index. Comorbidities such as congestive heart failure and a history of cerebrovascular events were associated with mortality. Laboratory results showed significant differences in hemoglobin levels and iron binding capacity between survivors and nonsurvivors. The study found no significant differences in surgical procedures or reoperation rates between the groups. However, nonsurvivors had more postoperative complications. Multivariate analysis identified cardiopulmonary bypass time and new-onset acute renal failure as independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. Anemic patients treated with intravenous iron replacement had comparable perioperative outcomes to nonanemic patients, including similar lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stays and mortality rates. Conclusion: Treatment of preoperative anemia with intravenous iron replacement in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery resulted in outcomes comparable to those of nonanemic patients. This suggests that short-term intravenous iron replacement may be an effective strategy to improve surgical readiness and outcomes in anemic patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fatoş Dilan Köseoğlu (2024) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular surgery (n=193). Preoperative intravenous iron replacement vs. Nonanemic patients was evaluated on Perioperative outcomes including length of intensive care unit and hospital stays and mortality rates. Preoperative intravenous iron replacement in anemic patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery resulted in perioperative outcomes and mortality comparable to nonanemic patients (overall mortality 10.4%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: