Key result
Regional anesthesia for hip surgery was associated with favorable outcomes in overall mortality, thromboembolic events, blood loss, and transfusion requirements compared to general anesthesia.
Why the study?
Does regional anesthesia improve perioperative outcomes compared to general anesthesia in hip surgery patients?
Does regional anesthesia improve perioperative outcomes compared to general anesthesia in hip surgery patients?
Regional anesthesia appears to offer favorable perioperative outcomes compared to general anesthesia in patients undergoing hip surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support regional anesthesia in hip surgery; leaves open confirmation by randomized trials.
Over the last decades the demand for hip surgery, be it elective or in a traumatic setting, has greatly increased and is projected to expand even further. Concurrent with demographic changes the affected population is burdened by an increase in average comorbidity and serious complications. It has been suggested that the choice of anesthesia not only affects the surgery setting but also the perioperative outcome as a whole. Therefore different approaches and anesthetic techniques have been developed to offer individual anesthetic and analgesic care to hip surgery patients. Recent studies on comparative effectiveness utilizing population based data have given us a novel insight on anesthetic practice and outcome, showing favorable results in the usage of regional vs general anesthesia. In this review we aim to give an overview of anesthetic techniques in use for hip surgery and their impact on perioperative outcome. While there still remains a scarcity of data investigating perioperative outcomes and anesthesia, most studies concur on a positive outcome in overall mortality, thromboembolic events, blood loss and transfusion requirements when comparing regional to general anesthesia. Much of the currently available evidence suggests that a comprehensive medical approach with emphasis on regional anesthesia can prove beneficial to patients and the health care system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathias Opperer (2014) conducted a review in Hip surgery. Regional anesthesia vs. General anesthesia was evaluated on Perioperative outcomes (overall mortality, thromboembolic events, blood loss and transfusion requirements). Regional anesthesia for hip surgery was associated with favorable outcomes in overall mortality, thromboembolic events, blood loss, and transfusion requirements compared to general anesthesia.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: