Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator resulted in a similar infarct-related artery patency rate (75%) compared to streptokinase (76%) in patients with a first myocardial infarction.
270 patients presenting with a first myocardial infarction, evaluated at three weeks.
recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) vs streptokinase (1.5 million units intravenously) (100 mg intravenously)
patency rate of the infarct-related artery
Absolute Event Rate: 75% vs 76%
IN this issue of the Journal, White and his colleagues1 report on a clinical trial in which 270 patients presenting with a first myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to receive intravenously either 1.5 million units of streptokinase or 100 mg of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA). Left ventricular function was evaluated by contrast ventriculography and revealed no difference in the global ejection fraction three weeks after the infarction. The patency rate of the infarct-related artery was 76 percent in the group receiving streptokinase and 75 percent in the group receiving rt-PA. No significant difference in mortality was observed.It . . .
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
E Rapaport
University of California, San Francisco
New England Journal of Medicine
University of California, San Francisco
University of San Francisco
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
E Rapaport (Thu,) conducted a editorial in first myocardial infarction (n=270). recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) vs. streptokinase (1.5 million units intravenously) was evaluated on patency rate of the infarct-related artery. Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator resulted in a similar infarct-related artery patency rate (75%) compared to streptokinase (76%) in patients with a first myocardial infarction.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21f28a1b095894fc4e9cc1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198903303201309
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: