Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No AccessPerspectives on Aural Rehabilitation and Its InstrumentationArticle1 Jan 2007Measuring the Effects of Audiology Treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life Theresa H. Chisolm and Harvey B. Abrams Theresa H. Chisolm Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of South Florida VA Medical CenterBay Pines, FL Google Scholar More articles by this author and Harvey B. Abrams Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of South Florida VA Medical CenterBay Pines, FL Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/arii14.1.2 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In "Measuring the Effects of Audiology Treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life." Perspectives on Aural Rehabilitation and Its Instrumentation, 14(1), pp. 2–6 References Abrams, H., & Chisolm, T. H. (2000). Outcome measures: The audiological difference. In H. Hosford-Dunn, R. J. Roeser, & M. Valente (Eds), Audiology practice management (pp. 69–95). New York: Theime. Google Scholar Abrams, H., Chisolm, T. H., & McArdleR. (2005). Health-related quality of life and hearing aids: A tutorial.Trends in Amplification, 9, 99–109 CrossrefGoogle Scholar Abrams, H.B., Hnath-Chisolm, T., Guerreiro, S. M., & Ritterman, S. (1992). The effects of intervention strategy on self-perception of hearing handicap.Ear and Hearing, 13, 371–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Barton, G. R., Bankart, J., & DavisA. C. (2005). A comparison of the quality of life of hearing-impaired people as estimated by three different utility measures.International Journal of Audiology, 44, 157–163. Google Scholar Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Carter, W. B., & Gilson, B. S. (1981). The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure.Medical Care, 1, 787–805. Google Scholar Bess, F. H. (2000). The role of generic health-related quality of life measures in establishing audiological rehabilitation outcomes.Ear and Hearing, 21, 74S–79S. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Bruley, D. K. (1999). Beyond reliability and validity: Analysis of selected quality-of-life instruments for use in palliative care.Journal of Palliative Medicine, 2, 299–309. Google Scholar Chisolm, T. H., Abrams, H., & McArdle, R. (2004). Short- and long-term outcomes of adult audiological rehabilitation.Ear and Hearing, 25, 464–477. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Condill, S. (2006). Utility measures in patients with hearing loss. Unpublished doctor of audiology project, University of South Florida. Google Scholar Cox, R. M., & Alexander, G. C. (1995). The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit.Ear and Hearing, 16, 176–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Cox, R. M., & Alexander, G. C. (2002).The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Psychometric properties of the English Version.International Journal of Audiology, 41, 30–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Cox, R. M., Alexander, G. C., & Beyer, C. M. (2003). Norms for the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 14, 403–413. Google Scholar Cox, R. M., Hyde, M., Gatehouse, S., Noble, W., Dillon, H., Bentler, R., Stephens, S. D. G., Arlinge, R. A., Beck, L., Wilkerson, D., Kramer, S., Kricos, P., Gagne, J-P., Bess,F., & Halleberg, L. (2000). Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation.Ear and Hearing, 21, 106S–115S. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Day, H., & Jutai, J. (1996). Measuring the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: The PIADS.Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 9, 159–168. Google Scholar Furlong. W., Feeny, D., Torrance, G.W., Goldsmith, C. H., DePauw, S., Zhu, Z., Denton, M., & Boyle, M. (1998). Multiplicative multi-attribute utility function for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) System: A technical report, McMaster University Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper 98–11, December Working Paper 98–11, 1998. Google Scholar Gonzalez, G. (1997). The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly: Spanish Language Version. Unpublished master's thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL. Google Scholar Hickson, L., Worrall, L., & Scarinci. (2006). Measuring outcomes of a communication program for older people with hearing impairment using the International Outcome Inventory.International Journal of Audiology, 45, 238–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Jacobson, G. P., & Newman, C. W. (1990). The development of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory.Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 116, 424–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Lopez-Vazquez, M., Orozco, J. A., Jimenez, G., & Berruecos, P. (2002). Spanish Hearing Impairment Inventory for the Elderly.International Journal of Audiology, 4, 221–230. Google Scholar McArdle, R., Chisolm, T. H., Abrams, H.B., Wilson, R. H., & Doyle, P. J. (2005). The WHO-DAS II: Measuring outcomes of hearing aid intervention for adults.Trends in Amplification, 9, 127–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Mulrow, C. D., Aguilar, C., Endicott, J. E., Tuley, M. R., Velez, R., Charlip, W. S., Rhodes, M. C., Hill, J. A., & DeNino, L. A. (1990). Quality-of-life changes and hearing impairment: A randomized trial.Annals of Internal Medicine, 113, 188–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar National Institutes of Health. (1993). Quality of life assessment: Practice, problems, and promise—Proceedings of a workshop, October 15–17, 1990. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Google Scholar Newman, C. W., Jacobson, G. P., & Spitzer, J. B. (1996). Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory.Archives of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 122, 143–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Newman, C. W., Weinstein, B. E., Jacobson, G. P., & Hug, G. A. (1991). Test-retest reliability of the hearing handicap inventory for adults.Ear and Hearing, 12, 355–357. Google Scholar Noble, W. (2002). Extending the IOI to significant others and to non-hearing-aid–based interventions.International Journal of Audiology, 41, 27–29. Google Scholar Palmer, C. S., Niparko, J. K., Wyatt, J. R., Rothman, M., & de Lissovoy, G. (1999). A prospective study of the cost-utility of the multichannel cochlear implant.Archives of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 125, 1221–1228. Google Scholar Roberts, R., & Lister, J. (2005). Utility Measures for Audiology Application (UMAA) [Computer software]. Bay Pines, FL: VA Medical Center Bay Pines. Google Scholar Saunders, G. H., & Jutai, J. W. (2004). Hearing specific and generic measures of psychosocial impact of hearing aids.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 15, 238–248. Google Scholar Sembach, M. (2006). Utility measures in patients with BPPV. Unpublished doctor of audiology project, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL. Google Scholar Stark, P., & Hickson, L. (2004). Outcomes of hearing aid fitting for older people with hearing impairment and their significant others.International Journal of Audiology, 43, s390–398. Google Scholar Ventry, I. M., & Weinstein, B. E. (1982). The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly: A new tool.Ear and Hearing, 3, 128–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Ventry, I. M., & Weinstein, B. E. (1983). Identification of elderly people with hearing problems.Asha, 25(7), 37–42. Google Scholar WareJ. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection.Medical Care, 30, 473–483. Google Scholar Wayner, D. S., & Abrahamson, J. E. (1996). Learning to hear again: An audiology rehabilitation curriculum guide. Latham, NY: Hear Again. Google Scholar World Health Organization (1999). The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II: Field Trials Version. Geneva, Switzerland: Author. Google Scholar World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: Author. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByPerspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups6:6 (1504-1512)17 Dec 2021Designing and Implementing a Comprehensive Telehealth Aural Rehabilitation Program for Adult Cochlear Implant RecipientsCornetta L. Mosley Volume 14Issue 1January 2007Pages: 2-6 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Jan 1, 2007 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesasha-sigsCopyright & Permissions© 2007 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chisolm et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: