Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In Denktagebuch ( Thought diary , 1950‐73), Hannah Arendt wrote that acts which cannot be forgiven are beyond punishment and hence cannot be reconciled to. In this essay, I draw from Arendt to further theorize and extend the concept of irreconciliation. I draw together ethnographic material, historical material, documents, media reports, and reviews during this era of irreconcilability which includes Black Lives Matter; the memorialization debates on the removal of statues of enslavers; the history of slavery in the United Kingdom; and the ‘harmony ideology’ experienced by BAME (Black, Asian, and minority ethnic) academics within UK organizations linked to long‐term discrimination. I argue for the concept of irreconciliation as a bulwark against impunity, against a ‘window‐dressed’, symbolic performance of redress, and to be able to echo Arendt's words that ‘this’ – any original cause of injustice – ‘ought never to have happened’.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nayanika Mookherjee (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: