Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Let <TEX>M³q(c)</TEX> denote the 3-dimensional space form of index <TEX>$q=0,1$</TEX>, and constant curvature <TEX>c≠0</TEX>. A curve <TEX>α</TEX> immersed in <TEX>M³q(c)</TEX> is said to be a Bertrand curve if there exists another curve <TEX>β</TEX> and a one-to-one correspondence between <TEX>α</TEX> and <TEX>β</TEX> such that both curves have common principal normal geodesics at corresponding points. We obtain characterizations for both the cases of non-null curves and null curves. For non-null curves our theorem formally agrees with the classical one: non-null Bertrand curves in <TEX>M³q(c)</TEX> correspond with curves for which there exist two constants <TEX>λ≠0</TEX> and <TEX>μ</TEX> such that <TEX>λκ+μτ=1</TEX>, where <TEX>κ</TEX> and <TEX>τ</TEX> stand for the curvature and torsion of the curve. As a consequence, non-null helices in <TEX>M³q(c)</TEX> are the only twisted curves in <TEX>M³q(c)</TEX> having infinite non-null Bertrand conjugate curves. In the case of null curves in the 3-dimensional Lorentzian space forms, we show that a null curve is a Bertrand curve if and only if it has non-zero constant second Frenet curvature. In the particular case where null curves are parametrized by the pseudo-arc length parameter, null helices are the only null Bertrand curves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lucas et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: