Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, we make use of the B linder– O axaca decomposition to examine how the quality of budget institutions affects fiscal performance – primary balance and public debt – in sub‐ S aharan A frica. To organise our approach, we categorise sub‐ S aharan A frica countries according to the two main systems of budgetary institutions: the E nglish‐based system and the F rench‐based system. The quality of budget institutions is measured through five criteria: centralisation, comprehensiveness, fiscal and procedural rules, sustainability and credibility, and transparency. Our findings show that, on average, A nglophone A frica countries have better budgetary institutions than their F rancophone counterparts, and this difference is the main determinant of the fiscal performance gaps between the two groups. These performance gaps are mostly due to the characteristics effect, meaning that the relative poor fiscal performance of F rancophone countries is not due to the F rench‐based system itself but rather to the environment in which it operates. The budget process and procedures in these countries are relatively less comprehensive, sustainable and transparent and that adversely affects their fiscal performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Babacar Sarr (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: