Why the study?
Does the rating of perceived exertion of 13 accurately predict lactate minimum and maximal lactate steady state intensities in physically active men?
Does the rating of perceived exertion of 13 accurately predict lactate minimum and maximal lactate steady state intensities in physically active men?
The workload associated with a rating of perceived exertion of 13 is equivalent to lactate minimum and maximal lactate steady state intensities, offering a simpler alternative for evaluating aerobic capacity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RPE 13 may align with lactate thresholds in active men; hypothesis-generating before replacing lab measures in practice.
The maximal lactate steady state is the gold standard for evaluating aerobic capacity; however, it is time-consuming. The lactate minimum protocol is an easier alternative, but is not feasible and still expensive. This study investigated whether the rating of perceived exertion of 13 is an accurate predictor of lactate minimum and maximal lactate steady state intensities. Eleven physically active men performed three tests: (1) incremental exercise with workloads based on rating of perceived exertion of 10, 13, and 16 (experimental protocol - denominated RPE-13 test), (2) lactate minimum, and (3) maximal lactate steady state. No differences were observed among participants' workloads corresponding to rating of perceived exertion 13, lactate minimum, and maximal lactate steady state intensities. Thus, the workload associated with the rating of perceived exertion of 13 was equivalent to the other two protocols investigated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Madrid et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: