Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We use deep Chandra imaging to measure the distribution of X-ray luminosities (LX) for of star-forming galaxies as a function of stellar mass and redshift, using a Bayesian to push below the nominal X-ray detection limits. Our luminosity distributions all narrow peaks at LX ! 1042 erg s−1 that we associate with star formation, as opposed to that are traced by a broad tail to higher LX. Tracking the luminosity of these peaks as function of stellar mass reveals an ‘X-ray main sequence’ with a constant slope ≈0.63 ± 0.03 over 8.5 ! logM∗/M⊙ ! 11.5 and 0.1 ! z ! 4, with a normalization that increases redshift as (1 + z) 3.79 ± 0.12. We also compare the peak X-ray luminosities with UV-to-IR of star formation rates (SFRs) to calibrate the scaling between LX and SFR. We find LX ∝ SFR0.83 × (1 + z) 1.3, where the redshift evolution and non-linearity likely reflect in high-mass X-ray binary populations of star-forming galaxies. Using galaxies with broader range of SFR, we also constrain a stellar-mass-dependent contribution to LX, likely to low-mass X-ray binaries. Using this calibration, we convert our X-ray main sequence SFRs and measure a star-forming main sequence with a constant slope ≈0.76 ± 0.06 and normalization that evolves with redshift as (1 + z) 2.95 ± 0.33. Based on the X-ray emission, is no evidence for a break in the main sequence at high stellar masses, although we rule out a turnover given the uncertainties in the scaling of LX to SFR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aird et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: