Key result
Cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved mean exercise self-efficacy scores from 25.2 at entry to 26.2 at completion (P=0.025), though ethnic minority and single patients showed less improvement.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to determine improvements in exercise self-efficacy during cardiac rehabilitation and identify predictors of exercise self-efficacy change.
Does cardiac rehabilitation improve exercise self-efficacy in patients with coronary heart disease?
Observational (n=194)
Yes
Does cardiac rehabilitation improve exercise self-efficacy in patients with coronary heart disease?
Cardiac rehabilitation significantly improves exercise self-efficacy in most patients with coronary heart disease, though ethnic minorities and single patients may require tailored support.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support cardiac rehabilitation for exercise self-efficacy gains in coronary heart disease; leaves open tailored approaches for ethnic minorities and singles.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine exercise self-efficacy improvements during cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and identify predictors of exercise self-efficacy change in CR participants. METHODS: Patients with coronary heart disease at four metropolitan CR sites completed the Exercise Self-efficacy Scale at entry and completion. A general linear model identified independent predictors of change in exercise self-efficacy. RESULTS: The mean age of patients (n = 194) was 65.9 ± 10.5 yr, and 81% were males. The majority (80%) were married or partnered, 76% were White, and 24% were from an ethnic minority background. Patients received CR in-person (n = 91, 47%) or remote-delivered (n = 103, 54%). Exercise self-efficacy mean scores improved significantly from 25.2 ± 5.8 at CR entry to 26.2 ± 6.3 points at completion ( P = .025). The majority of patients (59%) improved their self-efficacy scores, 34% worsened, and 7% had no change. Predictors of reduced exercise self-efficacy change were being from an ethnic minority (B =-2.96), not having a spouse/partner (B =-2.42), attending in-person CR (B =1.75), and having higher exercise self-efficacy at entry (B =-0.37) (adjusted R2 = 0.247). CONCLUSIONS: Confidence for self-directed exercise improves in most, but not all, patients during CR. Those at risk for poor improvement (ethnic minorities, single patients) may need extra or tailored support, and screening for exercise self-efficacy at CR entry and completion is recommended. Differences identified from CR delivery mode need exploration using robust methods to account for complex factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Candelaria et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Coronary heart disease (n=194). Cardiac rehabilitation vs. Baseline (CR entry) was evaluated on Exercise self-efficacy score (p=0.025). Cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved mean exercise self-efficacy scores from 25.2 at entry to 26.2 at completion (P=0.025), though ethnic minority and single patients showed less improvement.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: