Key result
Dynamic handgrip exercise with fSENC detects obstructive CAD with ~79% sensitivity versus pharmacological stress CMR.
Why the study?
Dynamic handgrip exercise with fSENC offers a potentially cost-saving, ultra-fast, needle-free physiological stressor avoiding pharmacological side effects, but its diagnostic accuracy for detecting obstructive CAD needed assessment.
Does dynamic handgrip exercise with fast Strain-ENCoded imaging accurately detect obstructive CAD compared to pharmacological stress CMR in patients with suspected CAD?
Cross-Sectional (n=260)
Does dynamic handgrip exercise with fast Strain-ENCoded imaging accurately detect obstructive CAD compared to pharmacological stress CMR in patients with suspected CAD?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dynamic handgrip exercise combined with fast Strain-ENCoded imaging provides a fast, needle-free, and highly accurate alternative to pharmacological stress CMR for detecting obstructive CAD.
Previous data suggests dynamic handgrip exercise (DHE) as a potential physiological, needle-free stressor feasible for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) conditions. DHE-fast Strain-ENCoded imaging (fSENC) is potentially cost-saving, ultra-fast and avoids pharmacological side effects thereby targeting the drawbacks of conventional pharmacological stress CMR. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of DHE-fSENC for detecting ischemia-related wall motion abnormalities in suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients with known or suspected obstructive CAD referred for CMR stress testing were prospectively enrolled. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed in comparison to pharmacological stress CMR and in a subgroup, compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). The CMR protocol was extended by both-handed DHE with 80 repetitions per minute over 2 minutes followed by fSENC short-axis acquisition before pharmacological stress testing. Stress-induced impairment of regional longitudinal strain was graded suspicious for obstructive CAD. Two-hundred sixty individuals with cardiovascular high-risk profile (64±13 years, 75% male) were enrolled. DHE-fSENC provided a sensitivity of 79% (95% CI: 64-89) and specificity of 87% (95% CI 82-91) compared to pharmacological stress CMR. In a subgroup of 105 patients with recent ICA, high diagnostic accuracy was found for the detection of obstructive CAD (sensitivity 82% (95% CI: 67-92), specificity 89% (95% CI: 78-95)). Exam duration of DHE-fSENC was significantly reduced compared to conventional CMR stress protocols (DHE-fSENC 207±69 sec vs. adenosine-perfusion 287±82 sec vs. dobutamine-cine 1132±294 sec, all p< 0.001). DHE-fSENC allows for a reliable and fast detection of obstructive CAD, thereby expanding the applicability of needle-free CMR stress testing. Dynamic handgrip exercise and fast Strain-ENCoded imaging. Schematic visualization of the both-sided, dynamic handgrip exercise at approx. 50% of MVC and a frequency of 80/min including fSENC acquisition at rest and during DHE. The comparison between fSENC at rest and after DHE of the apical slice in this example shows an impairment of LS after DHE of the inferior apical wall. DHE and fSENC acquisition was integrated into CMR routine protocol and was performed before pharmacological stress. DHE-fSENC: response of longitudinal strain. Comparison of LS at rest and during DHE. In ischemic segments, longitudinal strain was significantly impaired during DHE. In contrast, LS was more pronounced during DHE in non-ischemic segments. DHE-fSENC: test accuracy compared to pharmacological stress CMR. Test accuracy of DHE-fSENC compared to pharmacological stress CMR was excellent with a sensitivity of 79% (64-89) and a specificity of 87% (82-91). CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; DHE = dynamic handgrip exercise; fSENC = fast Strain-ENCoded imaging; LS = longitudinal strain; MVC = maximum voluntary contraction; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value; SEM = standard error of the mean.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ochs et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) (n=260). Dynamic handgrip exercise with fast Strain-ENCoded imaging (DHE-fSENC) vs. Pharmacological stress CMR was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for detecting ischemia-related wall motion abnormalities in suspected obstructive CAD (Sensitivity 79%, Specificity 87%, 95% CI 64-89 (sensitivity), 82-91 (specificity)). Dynamic handgrip exercise with fast Strain-ENCoded imaging detected obstructive CAD with 79% sensitivity (95% CI 64-89) and 87% specificity (95% CI 82-91) compared to pharmacological stress CMR.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: