Why the study?
CMR pharmacological stress testing has contraindications, side effects, and substantial costs, whereas dynamic handgrip exercise may address these shortcomings as a physiological stressor.
Does dynamic handgrip exercise produce a sufficient physiologic stress response compared to dobutamine stimulation during CMR in healthy volunteers and CAD patients?
Does dynamic handgrip exercise produce a sufficient physiologic stress response compared to dobutamine stimulation during CMR in healthy volunteers and CAD patients?
Dynamic handgrip exercise is a feasible and safe physiological stressor for CMR that induces chronotropic and inotropic responses comparable or superior to intermediate dobutamine stimulation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
DHE feasible as physiological CMR stressor in small human study; leaves open diagnostic accuracy and clinical adoption versus pharmacological stress.
Purpose: CMR pharmacological stress-testing is well-established to detect myocardial ischemia. Despite stressor and contrast agents appear rather save, contraindications and side effects have to be considered. Substantial costs are further limiting its applicability. Dynamic handgrip exercise(DHE) may have the potential to address these shortcomings as a physiological stressor. We therefore evaluated the feasibility and physiologic stress response of DHE in relation to pharmacological dobutamine-stimulation by cardiac magnetic resonance(CMR). Methods: Two subgroups were prospectively enrolled: (i)volunteers without relevant disease and (ii)patients with known CAD referred for stress-testing. A both-handed, metronome-guided DHE was performed over 2 minutes continuously with 80 contractions/minute by all participants, whereas dobutamine stress-testing was only performed in group(ii). Short axis strain by fast-Strain-ENCoded imaging was acquired at rest, immediately after DHE and during dobutamine infusion. Results: Eighty middle-aged individuals(age 56±17years, 48males) were enrolled. DHE triggered significant positive chronotropic(HR rest :68±10bpm, HR DHE :91±13bpm, p<0.001) and inotropic stress response(GLS rest :-19.4±1.9%, GLS DHE :-20.6±2.1%, p<0.001). Exercise-induced increase of longitudinal strain was present in healthy volunteers and CAD patients to the same extent, but in general pronounced from basal to apical layers(p<0.01). DHE was aborted by a minor portion(7%) due to peripheral fatigue. The inotropic effect of DHE appears to be non-inferior to intermediate dobutamine-stimulation(GLS DHE =-19.5±2.3%, GLS Dob =-19.1±3.1%, p=n.s.), whereas its chronotropic effect was superior (HR DHE =89±14bpm, HR DOB =78±15bpm, p<0.001). Conclusions: DHE causes positive ino- and chronotropic effects superior to intermediate dobutamine-stimulation, suggesting a relevant increase of myocardial oxygen demand. DHE appears safe and timesaving with broad applicability. The data encourages further studies to determine its potential to detect obstructive CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ochs et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: