Key result
Preprocedural hs-TnT is linked to ~17% higher odds of LV recovery after AF ablation.
Why the study?
Identifying arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy among patients with LV systolic dysfunction is challenging, prompting exploration of factors predicting LVEF reversibility after catheter ablation of AF or flutter.
Does the preprocedural hs-TnT level predict the recovery of LVEF in patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter and reduced LVEF undergoing catheter ablation?
Cohort (n=40)
No
Does the preprocedural hs-TnT level predict the recovery of LVEF in patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter and reduced LVEF undergoing catheter ablation?
Preprocedural hs-TnT levels may help clinicians easily identify patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter whose reduced LVEF is likely to recover (arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy) following catheter ablation.
Preprocedural hs-TnT may identify reversible LV dysfunction after AF ablation; leaves open its utility for patient selection pending prospective validation.
Background Left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction is reversible in some patients once the arrhythmia is controlled. However, identifying this arrhythmia‐induced cardiomyopathy among patients with LV systolic dysfunction is challenging. We explored the factors predicting the reversibility of the LV ejection fraction (LVEF) after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter in patients with LV systolic dysfunction. Methods and Results Forty patients with a reduced LVEF (LVEF <50%; 66.2±10.7 years; 32 men) who underwent atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter ablation were included. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before and during the early (<4 days) and late phases (>3 months) after the ablation. Responders were defined as having a normalized LVEF (≥50%) during the late phase after the ablation. The LVEF improved from 39.8±8.8 to 50.9±10.9% at 1.2±0.6 days after the procedure, and to 56.2±12.2% at 9.6±8.0 months after the procedure (both for P <0.001). Thirty (75.0%) patients were responders. The preprocedural echocardiographic parameters were comparable between the responders and nonresponders. In the multivariate analysis, the preprocedural high‐sensitivity troponin T was the only independent predictor of the recovery of the LV dysfunction during the late phase after ablation (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06–1.33; P =0.001), and a level of ≤12 pg/mL predicted recovery of the LV dysfunction with a high accuracy (sensitivity, 90.0%; specificity, 76.7%; positive predictive value, 56.3%; and negative predictive value, 95.8%). Conclusions Preprocedural high‐sensitivity troponin T levels might be a simple and useful parameter for predicting the reversibility of the LV systolic dysfunction after atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter ablation in patients with a reduced LVEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aoyama et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation/flutter with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (n=40). Preprocedural high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) vs. Patients with higher preprocedural hs-TnT levels (or evaluated continuously) was evaluated on Reversibility of LV systolic dysfunction (normalized LVEF ≥50%) during the late phase (>3 months) after ablation (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.06-1.33, p=0.001). Preprocedural high-sensitivity troponin T was the only independent predictor of the recovery of left ventricular dysfunction after atrial fibrillation/flutter ablation (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.06-1.33, P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: