Key result
Low baseline E/Em (<15) was independently associated with improved ejection fraction (β = -3.854; 95% CI -5.99 to -1.72; P<0.001) 1 year after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Does pre-procedural E/Em predict improvement in LV systolic and diastolic function 1 year after catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=521)
Does pre-procedural E/Em predict improvement in LV systolic and diastolic function 1 year after catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: β -3.854 (95% CI -5.99 to -1.72)
p-value: p=<0.001
Pre-procedural E/Em ratio can predict which patients will experience improvements in LV systolic versus diastolic function following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Low baseline E/Em may identify AF patients likely to improve EF after ablation; leaves open whether it should guide selection pending prospective trials.
AIMS: Successful rhythm control after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation is known to induce left atrial reverse remodelling and improve left ventricular (LV) function. We explored the clinical factors affecting LV systolic and diastolic function 1-year after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared pre-procedural and 1-year follow-up echocardiograms in 521 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent catheter ablation. Left ventricular systolic function was estimated by the ejection fraction (EF); diastolic function was estimated by the ratio of early transmitral flow velocity (E) to early mitral annular velocity (Em). (i) Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation significantly reduced left atrium volume index (P < 0.001) and improved LV EF both in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (n = 133, P = 0.008) and those without recurrence (n = 388, P < 0.001). (ii) Follow-up EF was significantly improved in patients with baseline E/Em < 15 (n = 454, P < 0.001), whereas E/Em was significantly reduced in patients with pre-procedural E/Em ≥ 15 (n = 67, P = 0.008). (iii) Baseline E/Em < 15 (β = -3.854, 95% CI -5.99 to -1.72, P < 0.001), baseline EF <50% (β = 10.586, 95% CI 7.55 to 13.63, P < 0.001), and female (β = -1.726, 95% CI -3.36 to -0.10, P = 0.038) were independently associated with improved EF. Baseline E/Em ≥ 15 (β = 4.896, 95% CI 3.45 to 6.34, P < 0.001) and younger age (β = -0.066, 95% CI -0.11 to -0.02, P = 0.003) were independent factors associated with improved E/Em. CONCLUSION: Pre-procedural E/Em predicted improvement in LV systolic and diastolic functions 1 year after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Low baseline E/Em was independently associated with improved EF, while high E/Em predicted improvement in LV diastolic function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=521). Pre-procedural E/Em ratio was evaluated on Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (β -3.854, 95% CI -5.99 to -1.72, p=<0.001). Low baseline E/Em (<15) was independently associated with improved ejection fraction (β = -3.854; 95% CI -5.99 to -1.72; P<0.001) 1 year after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: