Isoelectric focusing in very alkaline immobilized pH gradients (IPG) was adopted for checking the purity and assessing the pI value of two strongly alkaline proteases: Savinase and Durazym. The first enzyme (known to be the most alkaline) contains 5 Asp, 5 Glu, 7 His, 7 Tyr, 5 Lys, no Cys and 8 Arg residues and should have a theoretical pI of 9.7. Yet, when focused in a pH 9-11 IPG interval, it was lost in the cathodic compartment. After repeated attempts at creating even more alkaline pH intervals, a pH 10-12 IPG range was finally optimized and proved successful in focusing both enzymes midway between the two electrodic compartments. The pI of Savinase was measured as 11.15 +/- 0.15; that of Durazym as 10.95 +/- 0.20 and that of the pI marker cytochrome c as 10.6 +/- 0.17. Both enzymes (and a number of minor components in each preparation) were proven to be active by an in situ zymogram consisting of a casein/agar overlay. The discrepancy between theoretical and experimental pI values could not be fully reconciled: when correcting for pK values of amino acids in proteins at 10 degrees C, instead of the tabulated values at 25 degrees C, the pI should increase to a value of 10. Differential UV spectra showed that ca. 1/2 Tyr are buried in the protein interior and are thus unable to contribute to surface charge. This further increases the pI value by 0.3 pH units to a value of 10.3, still quite removed from the experimentally assessed pI value (in the gel, at 10 degrees C) of 11.15.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bossi et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: