Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article tracks the disconnections and connections, junctures and disjunctures between the ‘theoretically oriented’ literature (concerned with philosophical or sociological understanding of educational contexts) and the ‘practice-oriented’ literature (concerned with the practice and procedures of teaching and learning) on boys, masculinity, and schooling. It identifies points of disjuncture and overlap between the two literatures, discusses these disjunctures, and presents the various strengths and weaknesses of each body of literature. Arguing that the two literatures have a valuable contribution to make by combining their efforts (that is, translating theory into practice terms or theorizing practice), this article gives suggestions for how both bodies of literature might be made more relevant to the other.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marcus B. Weaver‐Hightower (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: