Key result
Physiologically fast fibers from rat diaphragm had larger cross-sectional areas, produced more tension per area, and were less sensitive to calcium than physiologically slow fibers.
Authors
Loading...
Rat diaphragm data should not yet inform clinical decisions; extends basic fiber-type physiology but requires disease-model validation.
Eddinger et al. (1987) studied this question. Fast fibers (Type II) vs. Slow fibers was evaluated on Maximum isometric tension, maximum velocity of shortening, and tension-pCa relationships. Physiologically fast fibers from rat diaphragm had larger cross-sectional areas, produced more tension per area, and were less sensitive to calcium than physiologically slow fibers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: