Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) is a mosquito-borne zoonotic pathogen causing outbreaks in humans and ruminants across Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. Originally restricted to the Great Rift Valley, RVFV has expanded geographically, prompting its classification by WHO as a pathogen of pandemic potential. We investigated the evolutionary and spatial dynamics of RVFV across Africa. METHODS: We used genomic data generated at the International Livestock Research Institute Nairobi genomic laboratory (BioProject PRJNA1106221) and combined with publicly available datasets retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology (NCBI) GenBank nucleotide database. In retrieving RVFV genome sequences from the NCBI GenBank, we applied the search terms "Rift Valley fever virus segment L AND 6404SLEN", "Rift Valley fever virus segment M AND 3885SLEN", and "Rift Valley fever virus segment S AND 1520:1690SLEN" for L (Large), M (Medium), and S (Small) segments, respectively. For sequences without additional spatiotemporal information, we searched PubMed to extract the associated sequence metadata. We performed molecular clock analysis, phylogenetic inference, phylodynamic modelling (continuous phylogeographic reconstruction), and landscape phylogeography on the three RVFV genome segments (L, M, and S). We aimed to assess evolutionary rates, dispersal patterns, and environmental drivers. Focus was placed on lineage C, the most widely distributed variant. FINDINGS: per year. INTERPRETATION: Lineage C appears capable of establishing endemic transmission in new regions, with ongoing diversification observed during interepidemic periods. These observations reinforce the value of continuous genomic surveillance, particularly during cryptic transmission phases when adaptive mutations might emerge. Although further evidence is needed, observed trends in climate variability and land-use change point to the potential benefit of targeted surveillance in settings that could be at increased risk, including urban centres and wetlands. FUNDING: This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention.
Juma et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: