PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 2016Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications0 citationsOpen Access

Current Management of Ventricular Tachycardia: Approaches and Timing

View Full Paper
RJRoy M. JohnWSWilliam G. Stevenson

Structured PICO

P
Population
Patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) in the presence of structural heart disease, or idiopathic VTs/PVCs that are symptomatic or worsen LV function.
I
Intervention
Management strategies including implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), antiarrhythmic drugs (beta-blockers, amiodarone), and catheter ablation.

This review highlights the evolving role of catheter ablation as an earlier intervention for ventricular tachycardia, given the limitations of ICD shocks and antiarrhythmic drug toxicities.

Abstract

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) in the presence of structural heart disease is associated with sudden cardiac death and warrants prompt attention. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) while highly effective in terminating sustained ventricular arrhythmias and reducing mortality, have no effect on the arrhythmia substrate and recurrent shocks for VT termination occur in approximately 20% of patients. Shocks worsen quality of life and are associated with progression of heart failure and increased mortality. Antiarrhythmic drugs, mainly in the form of beta-blockers or amiodarone, are moderately effective in reducing ICD therapies but drug intolerance and serious toxicities of amiodarone necessitate drug cessation in a quarter of patients. Catheter ablation has emerged as an effective treatment for control of frequent VT episodes and can be life saving in cases of incessant VT or VT storm. As experience increases, it is being used increasingly earlier, rather than a last resort therapy. Efficacy varies with the nature of the underlying heart disease. Intramural arrhythmia substrate and failure to create permanent ablation lesions remain challenges and repeat procedures are necessary in a third to a half of patients. For idiopathic VTs or PVCs that are symptomatic or worsen LV function, catheter ablation is often an effective therapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

John et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a220fa19f07bfb2f8e21b66https://doi.org/10.15212/cvia.2015.0015
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Electrical Storm Presages Nonsudden Death2001 · 396 citations
  2. 2Linear Ablation Lesions for Control of Unmappable Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Ischemic and Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy2000 · 1,223 citations
  3. 3Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Originating from the Papillary Muscles in the Left Ventricle: Prevalence, Electrocardiographic and Electrophysiological Characteristics, and Results of the Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation2009 · 116 citations
  4. 4Clinical and electrophysiological characteristics in patients with sustained monomorphic reentrant ventricular tachycardia associated with dilated-phase hypertrophic cardiomyopathy2011 · 34 citations
  5. 5Epicardial Substrate and Outcome With Epicardial Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia2009 · 361 citations