Why the study?
Does combined inhibition of angiotensin II and thromboxane A2 reduce enhanced renal adrenergic nerve sensitivity in rats with norepinephrine-induced acute renal failure?
Does combined inhibition of angiotensin II and thromboxane A2 reduce enhanced renal adrenergic nerve sensitivity in rats with norepinephrine-induced acute renal failure?
In a rat model of acute renal failure, enhanced vascular sensitivity to renal nerve stimulation and paradoxical vasoconstriction to reduced perfusion pressure are mediated by intrarenal angiotensin II and thromboxane A2 accelerating adrenergic neurotransmitter release.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Extends mechanistic insight in experimental acute renal failure; leaves open whether dual inhibition translates to patients.
The roles of intrarenal angiotensin (A) and thromboxane (TX) in the vascular hypersensitivity to renal nerve stimulation (RNS) and paradoxical vasoconstriction to renal perfusion pressure (RPP) reduction in the autoregulatory range in 1 wk norepinephrine (NE)-induced acute renal failure (ARF) in rats were investigated. Renal blood flow (RBF) responses were determined before and during intrarenal infusion of an AII and TXA2 antagonist. Saralasin or SQ29548 alone partially corrected the slopes of RBF to RNS and RPP reduction in NE-ARF rats (P less than 0.02). Saralasin + SQ29548 normalized the RBF response to RNS. While combined saralasin + SQ29548 eliminated the vasoconstriction to RPP reduction, similar to the effect of renal denervation, appropriate vasodilatation was not restored. Renal vein norepinephrine efflux during RNS was disproportionately increased in NE-ARF (P less than 0.001) and was suppressed by saralasin + SQ29548 infusion (P less than 0.005). It is concluded that the enhanced sensitivity to RNS and paradoxical vasoconstriction to RPP reduction in 1 wk NE-ARF kidneys are the result of intrarenal TX and AII acceleration of neurotransmitter release to adrenergic nerve activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robinette et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: