Key result
PTSD treatments, particularly cognitive behavioral interventions, reduced cardiovascular reactivity to trauma-related stressors, though evidence for tonic cardiovascular functioning was mixed.
Why the study?
PTSD is linked to altered physiological functioning and poorer cardiovascular health outcomes, but whether PTSD interventions improve cardiovascular physiological intermediaries remained an important open question.
Do interventions for PTSD improve cardiovascular physiological intermediaries in patients with PTSD?
Systematic Review
Do interventions for PTSD improve cardiovascular physiological intermediaries in patients with PTSD?
PTSD treatments, particularly cognitive behavioral interventions, may reduce cardiovascular reactivity to trauma cues, potentially ameliorating cardiovascular risk, though higher quality studies are needed.
PTSD treatments may reduce trauma-cue cardiovascular reactivity; extends evidence linking PTSD therapy to lower cardiovascular risk.
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is linked to both altered physiological functioning and poorer cardiovascular health outcomes, including an increased risk for cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular-related mortality. An important question is whether interventions for PTSD might ameliorate the risk for poorer health by improving cardiovascular physiological intermediaries. To begin to characterize the literature addressing this question, we conducted a systematic review of empirical studies examining the impact of PTSD interventions on cardiovascular physiological intermediaries, including blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), cardiac impedance, and subclinical atherosclerosis. Outcomes included both tonic (i.e., resting) cardiovascular functioning and cardiovascular reactivity (CVR). A total of 44 studies met the inclusion criteria. There was mixed evidence regarding whether PTSD treatment improved tonic cardiovascular functioning. There was stronger evidence that PTSD treatments reduced CVR to trauma-related stressors, particularly for higher-quality studies of cognitive behavioral interventions. No studies examined cardiac impedance or subclinical atherosclerosis. The studies had a high degree of heterogeneity in the populations sampled and interventions tested. Moreover, they generally included small sample sizes and lacked control conditions. Interventions for PTSD may improve cardiovascular physiological outcomes, particularly CVR to trauma cues, although additional methodologically rigorous studies are needed. We outline changes to future research that would improve the literature regarding this important question, including the more frequent use of control groups and larger sample sizes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bourassa et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review in Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD interventions vs. Control conditions (often lacking) was evaluated on Cardiovascular physiological intermediaries (blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac impedance, and subclinical atherosclerosis). PTSD treatments, particularly cognitive behavioral interventions, reduced cardiovascular reactivity to trauma-related stressors, though evidence for tonic cardiovascular functioning was mixed.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: