Demonstrates enhanced partition quality in mesh agglomeration using GNN models, suggesting improved computational efficiency.
We introduce , an open-source Python library designed for mesh agglomeration in both two- and three-dimensions, based on employing Graph Neural Networks (GNN). serves as a comprehensive solution for training a variety of GNN models, integrating deep learning and other advanced algorithms such as METIS and k-means to facilitate mesh agglomeration and quality metric computation. The library’s introduction is outlined through its code structure and primary features. The GNN framework adopts a graph bisection methodology that capitalizes on connectivity and geometric mesh information via SAGE convolutional layers, in line with the methodology proposed in (Antonietti and Manuzzi in J Comput Phys 452:110900, 2022; Antonietti et al. in Polytopal mesh agglomeration via geometrical deep learning for three-dimensional heterogeneous domains, arXiv:2406.10587 , 2024). Additionally, the proposed library incorporates reinforcement learning to enhance the accuracy and robustness of the model initially suggested in [1, 2] for predicting coarse partitions within a multilevel framework. A detailed tutorial is provided to guide the user through the process of mesh agglomeration and the training of a GNN bisection model. We present several examples of mesh agglomeration conducted by , demonstrating the library’s applicability across various scenarios. Furthermore, the performance of the newly introduced models is contrasted with that of METIS and k-means, illustrating that the proposed GNN models are competitive regarding partition quality and computational efficiency. Finally, we exhibit the versatility of ’s interface through its integration with , an open-source library implementing discontinuous Galerkin methods on polytopal grids for the numerical discretization of multiphysics differential problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antonietti et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: